November 21, 2008

Blogging the Right Thing: Dude, Where’s My Candidate?

Posted by Adam Graham in : Mike Huckabee

Before I get started, I wanted to respond to a commenter who said I would force readers to go through all 27 chapters of Huckabee’s book.

That’s impossible as:

1) The book has 12 chapters (which actually seems to be a Standard for a Huckabee book as “From Hope to Higher Ground” and his weight loss book also had 12 chapters.)

2) Readers can read an entry or not. Their choice. But, if we’re going to talk about the book, let’s talk about it, not just rumor and innuendo about it.

Chapter 1 of Do the Right Thing is called, “Dude, Where’s My Candidate?” and focuses on a base that wasn’t enthused with the Rudy McRomney Trilemna (my term, not Huck’s.) Huckabee lays out a set of signature issues.

Huckabee makes a succinct case for staying a socially conservative course in the GOP, writing, “Having lost our reputation as competent managers and fiscal conservatives, we can’t afford to lose our credibility as social conservatives. If we do, they will point to us and say, ‘The Emperor has no clothes,” and deservedly so.”

Huckabee’s book gets a bit awkward grammatically. He put the book to bed in June, when the question of who would win the Presidency was an open issue. His book reflects it with warnings of why 2008 is a bad year to elect a Democrat. By the time of publication, it would have already happened or not.

Huckabee lists five reasons a Democratic administration would be bad: Health Care, Taxes, Protectionism (instead of education reform), and that “Democrats still don’t understand how viscerally, obsessively, and fanatically, the Islamo-fascists hate us, and how determined they are to kill us and destroy our Judeo-Christian culture and civilization.”

Huckabee then lays out the reasons that prompted his campaign. He laid out a sensible foreign policy, his belief in energy independence, his pro-second Amendment stance, support for the sanctity of life, and support for traditional marriage as issues that  prompted his run.

This section on core issues strengthens my belief that, if Palin runs, she will probably not have Mike Huckabee as an opponent. Except the Fair Tax, on the core issues that made Huckabee’s core platform, he and Palin are in agreement.

Huckabee also uses this section to explain the difference between him and the-then big three. Contrary to news reports, Huckabee talks about all three. As I stated in my previous piece, I think this is book is geared towards people who may not have followed the nominating process with rapt attention.

He’s generally quite short with his comments on McCain: “I consistently supported President Bush’s tax cuts, John McCain voted against them in the Senate and then changed his mind to support them as he prepared to run for President.”

Giuliani elicited some longer responses: “Rudy Giuliani said that his gun-control policies didn’t affect hunting.  I’m an avid hunter, but I know and you know the Second Amendment isn’t about hunting: it’s about tyranny. The Founding Fathers weren’t worried about being able to bag a duck or a deer; they were worried about us being able to keep our fundamental freedoms…” and went on another two paragraphs.

Romney was hit hardest in this section on flip flops, the whole flap about whether Romney owned a firearm. Asks Huckabee, ” Any of you there not sure if you own a gun? I didn’t think so.” Huckabee concludes Romney offered a flip flop too many.

“He said he never really thought about when life begins until he was in his late fifties. I would be more inclined to accept his change as genuine rather than politically expedient if he hadn’t changed on so many issues at once–abortion, homosexual rights, gun control, the Bush Tax Cuts, campaign finance reform, and his appreciation for President Reagan’s legacy, which he ran from in 1994 and clung to in 2007. He spent more time on the road to Damascus than a Syrian camel driver.”

Given the overall tone of the chapter, introducing the central conflict with Romney and explaining the key issue conservatives had with Romney really wasn’t out of sorts.

As a post-script, a lot of folks seem to feel that Huckabee shouldn’t be releasing this book now because it’s time for the party to close and ranks and unify. May I ask behind whom and for what? We have no effective national leadership and no agenda. Huckabee timed the release of his book so that it was after the Presidential elections and well before the next Congressional Session. I’d argue that this is the time to go ahead and have our fights. Other than helping out in Georgia, there’s really not much to do.

For crying out loud, there seem to be some Republicans who believe the best time to discuss differences and issues is-well, never. Yes, the perfect model for political parties: dysfunctional families.

3 Comments

  1. Comment by Warner Todd Huston

    … and this raises another question for me about Huckabee’s character. Why all this bashing of other Republicans? I really have no interest what Mike Huckabee thinks about bashing Romney, Thompson, Giuliani or (and especially) Palin.

    If I wanted Huckabee to be a GOP leader (and I do NOT want that) I’d want him to go after the enemy, not everyone else in his own party.

    This is all in bad, bad taste, and also makes a mockery of Reagan’s 11th commandment.

  2. Comment by warnertoddhuston

    Oh, and I forgot to say this… I think it is pretty low to excuse such virulent attacks on his own people by saying we are at a time when we need new thought, new leadership. Great, if we need that new thought and new leadership, let’s have it. But what we DON’T need is the constant distractions of attacking all our own people. Finger pointing is NOT the way to show the way forward.

    I would have had far more respect for Huckabee if he’d have presented his great ideas in a forward thinking and positive way and forgot about all the name calling and finger pointing.

    For instance, what if I came to you, Adam, and said, “Hey, Adam, I like some of your ideas, but you really suck. You aren’t a real conservative and you should be ridiculed and destroyed. But I have a better plan.” Now, after such an outburst, would you be disposed to think that I should be your leader and that we could work together or would your first thought to tell me to lump it?

    Somehow, I think you’d be more inclined to tell me off. And rightfully so.

    Huckabee did just that. He punched everyone he could think of in the gut, then asked for their support as our new leader. As a result, I am not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

  3. Comment by Adam Graham

    Warner, first of all, Palin is not actually in this book. He finished the book in June. THis is a book about the Primary Campaign and he’s not charging Romney or anyone else with crimes. He’s explaining the differences and why he ran. He’s being honest about what happened. Now, we can candy coat it, but I think it’s refreshingly honest and it’s creating a lot of debate that I think is healthy.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.