Comments on: Board Called for Clemency for Dumond While Clinton Was Governor http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/board-called-for-clemency-for-dumond-while-clinton-was-governor/ Fighting a never ending battle... Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Adam Graham http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/board-called-for-clemency-for-dumond-while-clinton-was-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-35680 Adam Graham Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:14:30 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/board-called-for-clemency-for-dumond-while-clinton-was-governor/#comment-35680 Well, the problem here, Steltek is that Dumond cut the brassiere of the woman which was the same thing that happened with the woman raped in the 1980s. Well, the problem here, Steltek is that Dumond cut the brassiere of the woman which was the same thing that happened with the woman raped in the 1980s.

]]> By: Steltek http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/board-called-for-clemency-for-dumond-while-clinton-was-governor/comment-page-1/#comment-35606 Steltek Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:24:50 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/board-called-for-clemency-for-dumond-while-clinton-was-governor/#comment-35606 Well, here's a key issue -- has anyone actually proven Dumond committed the original crime? Because, it's worth noting that the evidence seems to point to his innocence. The subsequent crime does not prove guilt of the original crime. Dumond was attacked, raped, and then castrated with razor wire in his own home. Do not underestimate the psychological damage that would do to a man, especially an innocent man, to be utterly stripped of his manhood in every way, in such a horrific fashion. I can honestly see him being innocent of the original crime, but the damage done by his ordeal turning him into the kind of person who could commit the subsequent crime. The point being, if there was good reason to believe his innocence of the first crime, that is not overridden by his commission of the subsequent. Well, here’s a key issue — has anyone actually proven Dumond committed the original crime? Because, it’s worth noting that the evidence seems to point to his innocence. The subsequent crime does not prove guilt of the original crime. Dumond was attacked, raped, and then castrated with razor wire in his own home. Do not underestimate the psychological damage that would do to a man, especially an innocent man, to be utterly stripped of his manhood in every way, in such a horrific fashion. I can honestly see him being innocent of the original crime, but the damage done by his ordeal turning him into the kind of person who could commit the subsequent crime.

The point being, if there was good reason to believe his innocence of the first crime, that is not overridden by his commission of the subsequent.

]]>