Dave G writes:
Politics shouldn’t be about religious beliefs.
Which is funny because earlier in the same post as an argument for a secularist witch hunt on Governor Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy, Dave G pleaded us for stop persecuting the poor beleaguered Trigg Truthers and long-distance parenting judges because they were only concerned about how this might effect the Presidency:
It does mean that we wondered whether Bristol Palin becoming pregnant despite the aforementioned consequences was the result of a worldview held by the Palins that included such things as an opposition to contraception, a belief that higher education wasn’t important for women, etc, beliefs that could and would have an impact on public policy if Sarah Palin at any point became President of the United States.
It has been argued that higher education is a waste for the 46% who end up dropping out, regardless of gender, but that’s neither here nor there. It seems to me that what Dave G is arguing is that there are two particularly disturbing potential religious beliefs that they feared the Palin family held:
Opposition to Contraception
Belief that a woman can be fulfilled without a 4-year degree.
Palin has been clear that she’s not opposed to contraception. She hasn’t said anything specifically about higher education, but like most people with any experience, she probably knows folks without four year degrees who live successful, happy lives.
But this begs a question, “What exactly does this have to do with being President of the United States?” It has nothing to do with national security, almost nothing to do with fiscal policy, and unless you want to suggest that the Presidency is going to be a bully pulpit for a, “Don’t stay in school, don’t use contraception message,” it doesn’t have a whole lot to do with social policy.
So from what I’m understanding from Dave G the statement honestly needs revised:
”Politics shouldn’t be about religious beliefs unless I want it to be..”
A little bit of a confusing standard. So what is the proper role of religion in politics?