<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civility and Talibania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/civility_and_talibania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/civility_and_talibania/</link>
	<description>Fighting a never ending battle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Graham [Member]</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/civility_and_talibania/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Graham [Member]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsweb.us/blog/index.php/a/2007/03/19/civility-and-talibania/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and any other industry they would find the lack of regulation appalling. Imagine if someone proposed a bill that said you could see a warning label on cigarettes provided you askk for it. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and any other industry they would find the lack of regulation appalling. Imagine if someone proposed a bill that said you could see a warning label on cigarettes provided you askk for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron [Visitor]</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/civility_and_talibania/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron [Visitor]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsweb.us/blog/index.php/a/2007/03/19/civility-and-talibania/#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>Russ&#039;s argument is typical.  Any measure that might potentially reduce the number of abortions is met with blind opposition.  He &quot;did some googling&quot; and found that women currently can request to see the ultrasound.  Which, of course, is not the point.  This bill requires doctors to offer the mother a view of the ultrasound image.  I would ask Radical Russ which abortion provider he knows of that would use the ultrasound image to dissuade the mother from going through with the abortion?  If there are doctors out there that fundamentally oppose abortions, they are hardly performing them themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ&#8217;s argument is typical.  Any measure that might potentially reduce the number of abortions is met with blind opposition.  He &#8220;did some googling&#8221; and found that women currently can request to see the ultrasound.  Which, of course, is not the point.  This bill requires doctors to offer the mother a view of the ultrasound image.  I would ask Radical Russ which abortion provider he knows of that would use the ultrasound image to dissuade the mother from going through with the abortion?  If there are doctors out there that fundamentally oppose abortions, they are hardly performing them themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

