<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee&#8217;s Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/huckabees-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/huckabees-strategy/</link>
	<description>Fighting a never ending battle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/huckabees-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-59971</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/?p=6430#comment-59971</guid>
		<description>Still, I wish him a victory in 2012...
The more hard-core purists I tend to support go down first.
Mike is good, and is good with an audience... Kind of folksy.
With better fund raising as well as the points made in this article, He may just be able to pull it off and I may be supporting him... It&#039;s an uphill battle, but we have to try...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, I wish him a victory in 2012&#8230;<br />
The more hard-core purists I tend to support go down first.<br />
Mike is good, and is good with an audience&#8230; Kind of folksy.<br />
With better fund raising as well as the points made in this article, He may just be able to pull it off and I may be supporting him&#8230; It&#8217;s an uphill battle, but we have to try&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/huckabees-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-59970</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/?p=6430#comment-59970</guid>
		<description>Follow his Mainstream Media coverage in 2007:
He received very little early, and his poll numbers confirmed this.
In late Sep. 2007 he gave a speech before the CFR; apparently they saw him as the most amenable (to them) of the second tiers, then suddenly the new &quot;dark horse&quot; was on all the Sunday news shows and just as soon, there he was...
rising in the polls. His rise served to dampen other (at that time) second tier candidates.  When he started to rise &quot;too high&quot; well, what the CFR bestows, it can also take back.  A barrage of negative and non coverage put the damper on him.
He played their game, but they didn&#039;t fully trust him...
If he doesn&#039;t sell out next time, they will destroy him again..
If he does, he will cease to be the Mike Huckabee that his supporters have come to love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow his Mainstream Media coverage in 2007:<br />
He received very little early, and his poll numbers confirmed this.<br />
In late Sep. 2007 he gave a speech before the CFR; apparently they saw him as the most amenable (to them) of the second tiers, then suddenly the new &#8220;dark horse&#8221; was on all the Sunday news shows and just as soon, there he was&#8230;<br />
rising in the polls. His rise served to dampen other (at that time) second tier candidates.  When he started to rise &#8220;too high&#8221; well, what the CFR bestows, it can also take back.  A barrage of negative and non coverage put the damper on him.<br />
He played their game, but they didn&#8217;t fully trust him&#8230;<br />
If he doesn&#8217;t sell out next time, they will destroy him again..<br />
If he does, he will cease to be the Mike Huckabee that his supporters have come to love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

