http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/kicking-margaret-henbest-and-wendy-jaquet-out-of-the-female-party/ Fighting a never ending battle... Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/kicking-margaret-henbest-and-wendy-jaquet-out-of-the-female-party/comment-page-1/#comment-41979 Ceecee Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:12:36 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/kicking-margaret-henbest-and-wendy-jaquet-out-of-the-female-party/#comment-41979 This feminist attack on those who want to protect women's rights not to have an abortion, just makes me sick. How can they be for women's rights if they won't do anything about male violence against women, or worse, actively oppose efforts to protect women from male violence, just because that male violence is done to push an abortion? But many pro-choicers will protest that they do a lot to protect women from male violence. Maybe so, but they quickly back away from promoting such protection for women when the woman is pregnant, wants to give birth and the male violence is "provoked" by the woman's refusal to get an abortion. It's like these so-called "pro-choicers" think that refusing to abort is asking for it, or deserving it, or that she's betraying women by refusing abortion. The more these women attack a woman's right to choose life, the more hypocritical they sound when they march in the street for a women's right to "choose." If they really believed in choice, they would support the woman who wants to give birth, even if the circumstances are less than ideal, and even if others in the woman's life wanted her to abort. They would certainly want to protect such women from violence. It's the pro-choice movement's dirty little secret that the most frequent cause of death in pregnant women is homicide, usually in retaliation for refusing to abort. The silence of the "pro-choice" movement on this issue is absolutely deafening. Something to think about the next time you hear them prattle on about "choice," or see them marching in the street to promote "choice." There is only one choice they want to protect. If you want to make a different choice, you're on your own. Don't expect any help or sympathy from these hypocrites. This feminist attack on those who want to protect women’s rights not to have an abortion, just makes me sick. How can they be for women’s rights if they won’t do anything about male violence against women, or worse, actively oppose efforts to protect women from male violence, just because that male violence is done to push an abortion?
But many pro-choicers will protest that they do a lot to protect women from male violence. Maybe so, but they quickly back away from promoting such protection for women when the woman is pregnant, wants to give birth and the male violence is “provoked” by the woman’s refusal to get an abortion. It’s like these so-called “pro-choicers” think that refusing to abort is asking for it, or deserving it, or that she’s betraying women by refusing abortion.
The more these women attack a woman’s right to choose life, the more hypocritical they sound when they march in the street for a women’s right to “choose.” If they really believed in choice, they would support the woman who wants to give birth, even if the circumstances are less than ideal, and even if others in the woman’s life wanted her to abort. They would certainly want to protect such women from violence.
It’s the pro-choice movement’s dirty little secret that the most frequent cause of death in pregnant women is homicide, usually in retaliation for refusing to abort. The silence of the “pro-choice” movement on this issue is absolutely deafening. Something to think about the next time you hear them prattle on about “choice,” or see them marching in the street to promote “choice.” There is only one choice they want to protect. If you want to make a different choice, you’re on your own. Don’t expect any help or sympathy from these hypocrites.

]]>