<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/more-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/more-likely/</link>
	<description>Fighting a never ending battle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/more-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-10125</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adamsweb.us/blog/more-likely/#comment-10125</guid>
		<description>I agree that Earth First and socialist/communist types are more likely to vote Dem.  Both parties have a lunatic fringe.  The presence of a few whackos doesn&#039;t say squat about the party.  Racists in the R party doesn&#039;t mean that all Rs are racist. 

Do you deny that the GOP had a southern strategy that essentially appealed along racial lines?

BTW, &quot;Reductio ad absurdum is also often used to describe an argument where a conclusion is derived in the belief that everyone (or at least those being argued against) will accept that it is false or absurd. However, this is a weak form of reductio, as the decision to reject the premise requires that the conclusion is accepted as being absurd. &quot;  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Earth First and socialist/communist types are more likely to vote Dem.  Both parties have a lunatic fringe.  The presence of a few whackos doesn&#8217;t say squat about the party.  Racists in the R party doesn&#8217;t mean that all Rs are racist. </p>
<p>Do you deny that the GOP had a southern strategy that essentially appealed along racial lines?</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;Reductio ad absurdum is also often used to describe an argument where a conclusion is derived in the belief that everyone (or at least those being argued against) will accept that it is false or absurd. However, this is a weak form of reductio, as the decision to reject the premise requires that the conclusion is accepted as being absurd. &#8221;  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

