Planned Parenthood Continues to Deceive the Public
Posted by Adam Graham in : Idaho Conservative, TheFrom Today’s Idaho Statesman Planned Parenthood once again spreads inaccurate information regarding the passage of a bill forbidding the transportation of minors across the state
A recent study indicated that a significant number of teens who chose not to discuss their abortion with a parent did so out of fear of abuse or being kicked out of their home. For teens who live in unsafe homes, CIANA would create a dangerous, one-size-fits-all government mandate.
Repeat after me, “Every state has a judicial bypass law.” If it’s an abusive parental situation, they can go to a judge. What this is about is thwarting laws that are meant to protect children. This is bad business for Planned Parenthood and that’s why this is in the paper.
Comment by 777denny [Member]
Planned Murderhood is a very deceptive organization. They live to lie about the abortion industry.
Do they tell us how many women and girls are coerced into having an abortion performed (notice that one does NOT “have” an abortion, but instead, has one performed apon someone ELSE)upon their babies by their boyfriends and husbands? Do they obey the laws concerning abortion mills? DO they distort data, facts and reality?
Do they call the option to abort a child “reproduction right?” EVERYBODY in this country has reproduction rights. When a woman wants to have an abortion performed on her child, she has ALREADY has reproduced!
They CONSTANTLY use FALSE labels, propaganda and rhetoric to keep the $6,000,000,000 BILLION DOLLAR abortion industry going at full speed. They are bloody murderers who profit from the desperation of women and girls. Dirty deeds done real cheap should be their motto.
As you can probably tell, I reall do DESPISE these parasites in our midst.
Comment by Adam Graham [Member]
Yes, with good reason
And you’re right. The left wants to ignore that Planned Parenthood is big business and big money.
Comment by binkyboy [Visitor]
You might want to read this: it appears HR478 was designed to totally retract the judicial bypass laws:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=summary&bill=h109-748
Hence, the Statesman appears to be correct.
Comment by Adam Graham [Member]
Is there some type of reading comprehension issue:
“Makes it an affirmative defense to a prosecution or civil action under this Act that a defendant reasonably believed that before the minor obtained the abortion, the required parental consent or notification or judicial authorization took place.”
So, if a minor obtains a judicial bypass and the adult taking them out of state believes they did, than it’s an affirmative defense that will get them off.
Comment by binkyboy [Visitor]
Actually, you are correct, I did misread that.