Comments on: Religious Freedom v. Political Correctness http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/ Fighting a never ending battle... Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Steve Johnson http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24383 Steve Johnson Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:53:12 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24383 Ahhh, I understand now. It was "PC liberalism" that kept me from calling you a religious bigot. Thanks for clearing that up. Ahhh, I understand now. It was “PC liberalism” that kept me from calling you a religious bigot.

Thanks for clearing that up.

]]> By: Adam Graham http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24243 Adam Graham Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:20:40 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24243 There's a big difference between traditional Christianity and PC liberalism. The content of the answer she gave is one that orthodox Christian apologists, the church fathers, etc. would agree with. As for attack, all she said when asked was that the world would be better if everyone was Christian. There’s a big difference between traditional Christianity and PC liberalism. The content of the answer she gave is one that orthodox Christian apologists, the church fathers, etc. would agree with.

As for attack, all she said when asked was that the world would be better if everyone was Christian.

]]> By: Steve Johnson http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24091 Steve Johnson Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:13:44 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24091 Your link is broken. I didn't say she attacked the Jewish people, I said she attacked the Jewish faith. You accused her critics of attacking 'religious faith', and I merely asserted that she was also attacking religious faith, albeit the faith of Jews. To assert that this is "the traditional Christian answer" is really not fair to a lot of us Christians who value kindness, humility, and grace. Your link is broken.

I didn’t say she attacked the Jewish people, I said she attacked the Jewish faith. You accused her critics of attacking ‘religious faith’, and I merely asserted that she was also attacking religious faith, albeit the faith of Jews.

To assert that this is “the traditional Christian answer” is really not fair to a lot of us Christians who value kindness, humility, and grace.

]]> By: Adam Graham http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24086 Adam Graham Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:54:08 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24086 First of all, "inartful" has been commonly used for quite some time. http://volokh.com/posts/1190736856.shtml . I have to say grammar riffs, particularly in that instance are lame. As to Coulter's comments, it was not an attack on the Jewish people. She was asked a question and responded with the traditional Christian answer. Coulter's aim also wasn't to shut up Jewish people who would disagree with her in the name of political correctness, nor did she set out to say anything about Judaism. She merely explained her beliefs and that of most Christians. First of all, “inartful” has been commonly used for quite some time. http://volokh.com/posts/1190736856.shtml . I have to say grammar riffs, particularly in that instance are lame.

As to Coulter’s comments, it was not an attack on the Jewish people. She was asked a question and responded with the traditional Christian answer. Coulter’s aim also wasn’t to shut up Jewish people who would disagree with her in the name of political correctness, nor did she set out to say anything about Judaism. She merely explained her beliefs and that of most Christians.

]]> By: Adam Graham http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24085 Adam Graham Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:34:40 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24085 Are grammar riffs all you can add to discussions? Are grammar riffs all you can add to discussions?

]]> By: Steve Johnson http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24084 Steve Johnson Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:34:01 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24084 It's interesting that you call the reaction to Coulter's comments an "attack on religious faith", since Coulter's comments themselves are an attack on religious faith, specifically the faith of Jews. BTW, your word "inartful" does not exist in the English language. It’s interesting that you call the reaction to Coulter’s comments an “attack on religious faith”, since Coulter’s comments themselves are an attack on religious faith, specifically the faith of Jews.

BTW, your word “inartful” does not exist in the English language.

]]> By: Tom Spencer http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-24077 Tom Spencer Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:02:51 +0000 http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/religious-freedom-under-fire/#comment-24077 Grammar 101, Subject/verb agreement: "The attacks on religious faith in the public square continues..." is incorrect. Try either: The attack on religious faith... continues or: The attacks on religious faith... continue Grammar 101, Subject/verb agreement:

“The attacks on religious faith in the public square continues…” is incorrect.

Try either:
The attack on religious faith… continues
or:
The attacks on religious faith… continue

]]>