Comments on: Ron Paul: Why They Hate Him

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:52:02 +0000

it will be hillary against ron )

By: Adam Graham

Adam Graham — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:08:39 +0000

Clayton, Hanlon’s Razor agreed with you.

By: Clayton E. Cramer

Clayton E. Cramer — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:39:14 +0000

He is not perfect, who is? Plus he is not a C.F.R. member, and I think its a conflict of interest when our elected representatives are attending secret meetings.

We need more transparency in govt. and maybe we wouldn’t have all the “conspiracy theorists” everywhere. when people don’t know whats going on their imagination tends to take over, I will admit.

It is the conspiracy theory stuff that scares the wits out of me about Ron Paul. I don’t know how much of this stuff that I hear from his followers reflects Ron Paul’s views, and how much is an unwillingness of Paul to drive away his more disturbed followers–but conspiracy theories are based on the false assumption that the people running are government are dramatically smarter than the average American. I wish that were true; it isn’t. Conspiracies require intelligence to keep running and secret; which is more likely? Stupid people screwing up, or smart people making elaborate conspiracies?

By: kalej

kalej — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:42:17 +0000

It may be uncomfortable, but to disagree with you, those “undesirables” are NOT the majority of his supporters. The majority of his supporters are people who are sick of the one party in DC. Sick of the bloated government and finally seeing a glimmer of hope in a candidate.

Forgive us for being a bit jubilant when Dr. Paul continues to thrive despite being largely ignored by the media.

Yes it is uncomfortable when the undesirables or anti-jewish crowd show up. They may be loud, they may hijack the thread, but they are by far the minority. Watch his speech at Google headquarters. I am sure you will agree Google isn’t run by skinheads.

By: Paul Weber

Paul Weber — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:05:54 +0000

The majority of americans think the government lied about 911. It’s funny how “truthers” are intended as a negative description by negative people. maybe 2 wrongs make a right.

I am not a “sheeple” at least. Ron Paul is an honest man, and that is quite refreshing from all the corruption in D.C. He is not perfect, who is? Plus he is not a C.F.R. member, and I think its a conflict of interest when our elected representatives are attending secret meetings.

We need more transparency in govt. and maybe we wouldn’t have all the “conspiracy theorists” everywhere. when people don’t know whats going on their imagination tends to take over, I will admit.

By: Bubblehead

Bubblehead — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:59:37 +0000

It’s the joooooos! (Remember, there are six o’s in “joooooos”.) I had the same thing happen one time I mentioned Ron Paul in my blog (also related to his support, or at least tolerance, of various 9/11 Truthers) — one of his minions showed up and threatened some sort of libel action. I mocked and belittled him or her.

By: Adam Graham

Adam Graham — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:29:37 +0000

I may not be able to get you for being a 9/11 truther, but I can get you for a lack of reading comprehension:

Many (but not all) are 9/11 truthers and other undesirables.

I said not all Paul supporters are 9/11 truthers. For whatever reason, you chose to ignore it.

By: Texas Little El

Texas Little El — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:39:36 +0000

Oops, that is Senator Craig, not Congressman

By: Texas Little El

Texas Little El — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:37:56 +0000

Yep, we are all 911 Truthers.You have no evidence to back that up and it is a nice smear attempt but when you come up with more than innuendo to support those facts I might take you seriously.

It’s also amazing that Congressman Sali isn’t asking for Congressman Craig to step down from office but I guess birds of a feather flock together.

By: DFO

DFO — Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:57:48 +0000

I highlighted your post today in my Idaho Blogosphere roundup, in case you want to stop by Huckleberries Online and comment further: http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/hbo/archive.asp?postID=18158 — dfo