<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Club Against Charity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/the-club-against-charity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/the-club-against-charity/</link>
	<description>Fighting a never ending battle...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/the-club-against-charity/comment-page-1/#comment-58540</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/?p=6136#comment-58540</guid>
		<description>I think there are some instances where I&#039;d object on what charity it goes to. My problem was with Roth&#039;s allocation of funds away from charity and towards cutting price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are some instances where I&#8217;d object on what charity it goes to. My problem was with Roth&#8217;s allocation of funds away from charity and towards cutting price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Callear</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/the-club-against-charity/comment-page-1/#comment-58533</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Callear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsweb.us/blog/?p=6136#comment-58533</guid>
		<description>Not to be Captain Obvious here, but I&#039;m very surprised to see that kind of garbage come out of Club for Growth.  Your thought, though, that one person or group should never complain about, or suggest alternatives for, the decisions a company makes on spending its own money, seems a little off to me as a general rule.  For example, if Target started giving money to United Way (if they don&#039;t already), I would hope to see conservatives griping about that.  It is only wrong in this situation because the idea put forward is nonsensical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be Captain Obvious here, but I&#8217;m very surprised to see that kind of garbage come out of Club for Growth.  Your thought, though, that one person or group should never complain about, or suggest alternatives for, the decisions a company makes on spending its own money, seems a little off to me as a general rule.  For example, if Target started giving money to United Way (if they don&#8217;t already), I would hope to see conservatives griping about that.  It is only wrong in this situation because the idea put forward is nonsensical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

