The Ad Hominem Assault of the Week

Binky Boy at 43rd State Blue began a blog article with an Ad Hominem attack against Bryan Fischer:

I’m sure Mr. Fischer, a–h— extraordinare, will be updating his post with some sort of proof that homosexual behaviors are riskier than heterosexual behaviors, especially when you compare the rates of infection and/or suicide between the two groups. And we’ll see that when? Oh yeah, when Mr. Fisher’s own personal hell freezes over.

Well, here’s some information:

The risk of anal cancer soars for those engaging in anal intercourse. According to one report, it rises by an astounding 4000%, and doubles again for those who are HIV positive.[iiib]

Can anyone refute that anal intercourse tears the rectal lining of the receptive partner, regardless of whether a condom is worn, and the subsequent contact with fecal matter leads to a host of diseases?

Diseases to which active homosexuals are vulnerable can be classified as follows:

Classical sexually transmitted diseases (gonorrhea, infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, syphilis, herpes simplex infections, genital warts, pubic lice, scabies); enteric diseases (infections with Shigella species, Campylobacter jejuni, Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, ["gay bowel disease"], Hepatitis A, B, C, D, and cytomegalovirus); trauma (related to and/or resulting in fecal incontinence, hemorroids, anal fissure, foreign bodies lodged in the rectum, rectosigmoid tears, allergic proctitis, penile edema, chemical sinusitis, inhaled nitrite burns, and sexual assault of the male patient); and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).[iv]

Can anyone refute that increased morbidity and mortality is an unavoidable result of male-with-male sex–not to mention the increased rates of alcoholism, drug abuse, depression, suicide and other maladies that so often accompany a homosexual lifestyle?[v] People with this whole cluster of behavior patterns are somehow “normal”?

Wow, seems pretty conclusive. Binkyboy begins with an Ad Hominem, does no research and states an opinion. Perhaps, he should have read his own opening sentence before posting this piece.

Ah, if not for their opinions, they would have nothing, and in having nothing, would seek to take it from others.