We Blew It Away
Posted by Adam Graham in : Presidential Race 2008A physicist says Time Travel is possible, at the risk of causing a universe-destroying paradox, many Conservatives know what they would do if they had it to do over including the respected Paul Weyrich of the Free Congress Foundation at a meeting of Social Conservatives:
Then, venerable Paul Weyrich—a founder of the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority, and the Council for National Policy (CNP)—raised his hand to speak. Weyrich is a man whose mortality is plain to see. A freak accident several years ago left him with a spinal injury, which ultimately led to both his legs being amputated in 2005. He now gets around in a motorized wheelchair. He is visibly paler and grayer than he was just a few years ago, a fact not lost on many of his friends in the room, some of whom had fought in the political trenches with him since the 1960s.
The room—which had been taken over by argument and side-conversations—became suddenly quiet. Weyrich, a Romney supporter and one of those Farris had chastised for not supporting Huckabee, steered his wheelchair to the front of the room and slowly turned to face his compatriots. In a voice barely above a whisper, he said, “Friends, before all of you and before almighty God, I want to say I was wrong.”
In a quiet, brief, but passionate speech, Weyrich essentially confessed that he and the other leaders should have backed Huckabee, a candidate who shared their values more fully than any other candidate in a generation. He agreed with Farris that many conservative leaders had blown it. By chasing other candidates with greater visibility, they failed to see what many of their supporters in the trenches saw clearly: Huckabee was their guy.
I was going to expand on Weyrich’s thoughts. We Social Conservatives blew it. Perhaps, it was our attempt to keep up with the demands of everybody in the conservative movement. Perhaps, it was just our cynicism after Bush that anyone running would really share our values. Probably a combination of the two. David Oatney sums it up far better than I could:
Weyrich simply refused to consider Mike Huckabee or give him a chance, even though Huckabee was the most clearly pro-life and pro-family candidate in the race. Adam Graham, Warner Todd Huston, John McJunkin, and myself spent virtually our entire Iowa Caucus Roundtable podcast blasting Huckabee for everything from high taxes to scholarships for illegal aliens. We brushed off the fact that the Minutemen endorsed Huckabee-and that group does not endorse immigration softies. We blasted Huckabee as a liberal, said he wasn’t really one of us, and that he was a phony (as if Mitt Romney were the real thing). We held out feigned hope that Fred Thompson would light a fire under himself and actually run to win. The truth was that his numbers were poor because he got in the race too late, and all he did was help John McCain (by blasting Huckabee instead of McCain in South Carolina) whether he intended to do so or not-and of course he endorsed McCain just days after his mentor Howard Baker did the same.
Then there was Huckabee, the pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-public prayer, pro-God, anti-atheist, social conservative Southern Governor. We couldn’t endorse this man…why? We all called him the Huckster-I remember Frank Cagle and myself both calling him that in a conversation-but Huckabee survived and showed integrity while doing so. With guts and gusto, Mike Huckabee carried on until the end. He wasn’t the perfect candidate, but for years we’ve said the Supreme Court was the place where the future of the country would be decided, and there would be no question of the kind of justices President Huckabee would appoint. We’ve collectively said we wanted a real pro-lifer in the White House, and a “true believer” in the Second Amendment. Mike Huckabee was all of these things, and we all got behind him (myself included), when the proverbial Sherman’s Army was about to enter political Atlanta…I blew it-but we all did. We had a candidate in this race, and that candidate did not fail conservatives-conservatives failed their candidate.
He said at well. Of course, I’ve used the Sherman’s Army comparison, particularly thinking of “Gone With the Wind” (an apt description of Conservatives’ chance of having a true conservative in office) and am reminded of another line from that great film as I hope we can do better. “After all, tomorrow is another day.”











Comment by Cameron
It always seemed to me that Huckabee represented a choice between social conservatism and fiscal conservatism. By choosing him for his social stands, one had to give up a little bit of fiscal conservatism in the process.
Comment by Adam Graham
He actually wasn’t that fiscally liberal. His new spending for the nation came in 3 areas: Building the fence, restoring the military to the Ronald Reagan level of the GDP, and improving the way we take care of our veterans. The level of new spending Huckabee proposed was about the same as Fred Thompson. Huckabee wanted to get rid of the Income tax and reform government in general. He had some issues in Arkansas, but there was some reason for that and I’ll be writing about that hopefully this weekend.